Case studies

How pairs moved after addressing the issues a report surfaced. Anonymized examples of what teams often see after acting on a report.

Project A · 90 days

38→81

SPREAD

3.1% → 0.4%

DEPTH

$8k → $110k

SLIP$10K

9.4% → 0.9%

"The report gave us a number our exchange contact actually respected. We knew exactly which gaps to close first."

Project B · 60 days

45→74

SPREAD

1.9% → 0.5%

DEPTH

$14k → $95k

SLIP$10K

5.2% → 1.1%

"Continuous quoting fixed the quote-gap flag within weeks. The peer comparison made the target obvious."